Legal Opinion

Tappan v. Boston Water Power Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 24, 1892PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorton, J.

These two actions involve the title to flats in Muddy River in Boston, lying between marsh lands on the easterly and westerly sides of the river, which belong respectively to the demandants and tenant. Both were tried together, and depend on the same facts. Evidence was introduced by the parties of acts of ownership and possession by themselves and their predecessors in title relating to a part of the demanded premises; but the court was not satisfied that such acts had been exercised. The cases therefore do not depend at all upon possessory titles. The demandants also claimed title by…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Peyroux and Others v. HOWARD AND VARION.Supreme Court of the United States · 1833
  2. Drury v. Midland RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
  3. Proprietors of Locks & Canals on Merrimack River v. Nashua & Lowell RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  4. Blackwell v. FostersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1858
  5. General v. WoodsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. CugliataSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977
  2. Iris v. Town of HinghamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  3. Rochester v. BarneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  4. Murphy v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  5. Thomas v. Ashland, Siskiwit & Iron River Logging Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1904

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API