Legal Opinion

Herron & Holland v. Dibrell Bros.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided January 8, 1891PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to judgment of corporation court of Danville, rendered January 22d, 1889, in an action of trespass on the case in assumpsit, wherein B. L. Dibrell and A. Dibrell, partners as Dibrell Bros., are plaintiffs, and M. P. Herron and W. W. Holland, partners as Herron & Holland, are defendants. The judgment being, adverse to the latter firm, they brought the case here on writ of error. Opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtFauntleroy, J.

This suit is in the form of trespass on the case in assumpsit, to recover damages for breach of contract. The declaration alleges, that on the 4th day of February, 1888, Dibrell Brothers, who were engaged in the tobacco trade in Danville, Virginia, entered into negotiation with Herron & Holland, who were also dealers in tobacco in the same town, for the purchase, by the said Dibrell Brothers, from the said Herron & Holland, of twenty-one hogsheads of leaf tobacco, at the rate of ten cents per pound, for the aggregate sum of $2,445.80, that the said Herron & Holland then and there, when the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lowe v. TrundleSupreme Court of Virginia · 1883
  2. Crenshaw v. SlyeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1879

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Alfonso Linwood Carney v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962
  2. McNeir v. Greer-Hale Chinchilla RanchSupreme Court of Virginia · 1953
  3. Smith v. HensleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1961
  4. Farmers Manufacturing Co. v. WoodworthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1909
  5. Milburn Wagon Co. v. NisewarnerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1894

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API