Hill Aircraft & Leasing Corporation v. Flanders
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Webb, Judge.
Hill Aircraft is a defendant in default, and as we stated when this case was previously before us (Flanders v. Hill Aircraft & Leasing, 137 Ga. App. 286, 288 (223 SE2d 482) (1976)), "by its default admitted the aircraft was unairworthy; that it had made fraudulent misrepresentations as to the number of hours on the engines and the prior use of the aircraft; that the aircraft was not merchantable nor fit for the purpose intended; that the aircraft was defective; these defects resulted in the left engine 'blowing’ a cylinder; and that other costs were incurred because of these…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Flanders v. Hill Aircraft & Leasing Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- McMichen v. Martin Burks Chevrolet, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Taylor v. Georgia Power CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Minter v. ReidCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
3Cited by8 opinions
- Michael N. Shingleton v. Armor Velvet CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Lanier Home Center, Inc. v. UnderwoodCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- Brown v. Joiner International, Inc.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1981
- Graham Brothers' Construction Co. v. C. W. Matthews Contracting Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Hill Aircraft & Leasing Corp. v. TylerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.