Legal Opinion

Hill Aircraft & Leasing Corporation v. Flanders

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 22, 1977No. 54283PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Webb, Judge.

Hill Aircraft is a defendant in default, and as we stated when this case was previously before us (Flanders v. Hill Aircraft & Leasing, 137 Ga. App. 286, 288 (223 SE2d 482) (1976)), "by its default admitted the aircraft was unairworthy; that it had made fraudulent misrepresentations as to the number of hours on the engines and the prior use of the aircraft; that the aircraft was not merchantable nor fit for the purpose intended; that the aircraft was defective; these defects resulted in the left engine 'blowing’ a cylinder; and that other costs were incurred because of these…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Flanders v. Hill Aircraft & Leasing Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  2. McMichen v. Martin Burks Chevrolet, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  3. Taylor v. Georgia Power CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  4. Minter v. ReidCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Michael N. Shingleton v. Armor Velvet CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  2. Lanier Home Center, Inc. v. UnderwoodCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  3. Brown v. Joiner International, Inc.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1981
  4. Graham Brothers' Construction Co. v. C. W. Matthews Contracting Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  5. Hill Aircraft & Leasing Corp. v. TylerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API