Legal Opinion

Parker v. Pressler & Pressler, LLP

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided June 30, 2009No. Civil Action 07-5687 (KSH)PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KATHARINE S. HAYDEN, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This action arises under the Fair Debt Collection Practice Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1692a, et seq. 1 Plaintiff Beulah Parker, a New Jersey resident, filed a complaint [D.E. # 1] on November 21, 2007 against: (1) Pressler & Pressler, LLP (“P & P”), a New Jersey law firm specializing in debt collection representation and a debt collector as defined under 15 U.S.C. § 1692a(6); (2) New Jersey-based Palisades Collection, LLC (“Palisades”), also a debt collector as defined under 15 U.S.C. § 1692a(6) (and a client of P & P); and (3) Gerard…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Caldwell v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Velez v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2012
  2. Swartz v. City Mortgage, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2012
  3. Marshall v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. Skinner v. Asset Acceptance, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2012
  5. Scroggin v. Credit Bureau of Jonesboro, Inc.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API