Legal Opinion

State v. Handran

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 19, 1989No. 10-87-03818; CA A48022PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*548WARREN, J.

Defendant was charged with theft in the first degree. ORS 164.055. The state appeals the trial court’s order suppressing evidence seized by the police without a warrant while searching defendant’s apartment for another suspect. We reverse.

At 10:30 p.m., Officer Putnam was dispatched to a Safeway store, where employes told him that two men had stolen four 12-packs of Budweiser beer. The employes described the suspects and estimated their ages to be 16 and 20. Less than two hours later, Putnam responded to a burglary call at an apartment located approximately one block from the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Texas v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Arizona v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. State v. OwensOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. KellerOregon Supreme Court · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. ChamblessCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. State v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. State v. RegerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  4. Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. BNSF Railway Co. v. Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa CountyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API