Legal Opinion

United States v. Stockyards Terminal Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota

Decided July 17, 1909PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLARD, District Judge.

This action is brought to recover a penalty under the act of June 29, 1906, entitled “An act to prevent cruelty to animals while in transit,” commonly called the “Twenty-Eight Hour Law” (34 Stat. 607, c. 3594 [U. S. Comp. St. Supp. 1907, p. 918]). The complaint states two causes of action ; but on the trial the case was dismissed as to the second cause of action, and as to the first it was heard upon an agreed statement of facts.

A shipment of five car loads of cattle was loaded at Lavina, Mont., at 11. p. m. July 31, 1908, consigned to the Union Stockyards, Chicago,…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. St. Joseph Stockyards Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1911
  2. United States v. Lehigh Valley R. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western New York · 1911
  3. United States v. Northern Pac. Terminal Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · 1911
  4. United States v. Delaware, L. & W. R.District Court, N.D. New York · 1913
  5. United States v. Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1910

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API