Gallagher Switchboard Corp. v. Heckler Electric Co.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWalter R. Hart, J.
The plaintiff moves pursuant to rule 109 of the Rules of Civil Practice for an order striking for insufficiency the second separate defense contained in the amended answer of defendant Heckler Electric Company, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as “ defendant ”). It is in substance alleged in said defense that the defendant signed under duress and compulsion a purported contract, dated March 25, 1961, modifying a purchase-order agreement theretofore entered into between plaintiff and defendant for the purchase by defendant from plaintiff of certain electrical equipment needed by the defendant for…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gallagher Switchboard Corp. v. Heckler Electric Co.New York Supreme Court · 1962
- Criterion Holding Co. v. CerussiNew York Supreme Court · 1931
- Wou v. Galbreath-Ruffin Realty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1959
- Underhill Construction Corp. v. CiraldoNew York Supreme Court · 1960
3Cited by3 opinions
- Austin Instrument, Inc. v. Loral Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1971
- Totem Marine Tug & Barge, Inc. v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1978
- Austin Instrument, Inc. v. Loral Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970