Philips Bros. Electrical Contractors, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge SIMPSON.
We are asked whether a prospective bidder may file a bid protest under the Commonwealth Procurement Code1 one year prior to the contracting agency’s anticipated solicitation of bids. The Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission (Contracting Agency) denied the bid protest of Philips Brothers Electrical Contractors, Inc. (Prospective Bidder), which challenged the Agency’s determination that a proposed new turnpike maintenance facility is not a public building subject to the Separations Act.2 Contracting Agency determined the *943bid protest was not ripe for review. It also concluded…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Philadelphia Entertainment & Development Partners, L.P. v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Alan R. v. Kemper National Insurance CompaniesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Township of Derry v. Pennsylvania Department of Labor & IndustrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Tragesser v. CooperSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Texas Keystone Inc. v. Pennsylvania Department of Conservation & Natural ResourcesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Clairton Slag, Inc. v. Department of General ServicesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Hanisco v. Township of WarminsterCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- In Re Septa Mvfrl Interest LitigationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Sayreville Seaport Associates Acquisition Co. v. Department of Environmental ProtectionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- C. Carulli & B. Carulli, h&w v. N. Versailles Twp. Sanitary Auth. v. Port Vue Plumbing, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.