Legal Opinion
Stewart v. United States Immigration & Naturalization Service
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 31, 1984No. 83 Civ. 7322 (WK)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
WHITMAN KNAPP, District Judge.
Plaintiffs have brought this action pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., alleging that their employer, the United States Immigration and Naturalization Service (“INS”) has discriminated against them on the basis of their color and national origin. Before us now is a motion by one of the plaintiffs, Leroy Stewart (hereinafter “plaintiff” or “Stewart”) for a preliminary injunction to prevent defendant “from discriminating against the plaintiff, subjecting the plaintiff to retaliatory harassment, continuing…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Sampson v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Veronice A. HOLT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the CONTINENTAL GROUP, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Patricia SHEEHAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PUROLATOR COURIER CORPORATION and Purolator, Inc., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Laymon Wesley Alsbury v. The United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- Jankowitz v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Leroy STEWART, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department v. BroadusDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Snead v. BursteinDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1986
- DC METRO. POLICE DEPT. v. BroadusDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989