Legal Opinion

James v. Fast Fare, Inc.

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided May 25, 1988No. C/A 87-3222-17PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

JOE F. ANDERSON, JR., District Judge.

This matter is before the court on the motion of defendant Fast Fare for summary judgment as to all counts pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. The motion is hereby granted.

Summary judgment is appropriate if the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law and there are no genuine issues of material fact. Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c). The party against whom summary judgment is sought “must set forth specific facts showing there is a genuine issue for trial.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(e). Fast Fare is entitled to judgment based on the relevant facts and applicable law.

M…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Deaton v. LeathSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
  2. Watkins v. MOBIL OIL CORPORATIONCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  3. State v. LackeySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dorn v. The Town of ProsperityCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
  2. Blackford v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API