Deaton v. Leath
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Ness, Justice:
This is a malicious prosecution action. Appellants contend the trial court erred in granting respondents’ Leaths’ motions for summary judgment. We disagree and affirm.
The Leaths caused appellants to be arrested and charged with trespassing and disorderly conduct. Appellants waived their right to a jury trial and were found guilty as charged by *84the Myrtle Beach City Recorder. They timely filed notices of intent to appeal in circuit court, but because of an equipment malfunction in the recorder’s court, a transcript of the proceedings could not be obtained. Appellants’ subsequent…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ricketts v. J. G. McCrory Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1924
- Georgia Loan & Trust Co. v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Kinton v. Mobile Home Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
- Boxer v. SlackWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1942
- Falkner v. AlmonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jackson v. City of AbbevilleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
- State v. SerretteCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
- James v. Fast Fare, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1988
- Deaton v. LeathSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
- Hanson v. City of SnohomishWashington Supreme Court · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.