Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Stang-Starr v. Byington

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1995No. S-94-355PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCaporale, J.

I. STATEMENT OF CASE

Pursuant to verdict, the district court dismissed this action wherein the plaintiff-appellant, Teri Stang-Starr, claims she was damaged by the negligent failure of the defendant-appellee, Dr. Robert T. Byington, to properly diagnose and treat abnormalities in her cervix. Stang-Starr then successfully moved to bypass the Nebraska Court of Appeals and here asserts that the district court erred by (1) refusing to permit her to question her medical experts regarding medical texts and treatises upon which they relied in their testimony and (2) inconsistently receiving in…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Co. v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  2. United States v. James W. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  3. State v. BronsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Fonda v. Northwestern Public Service Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1940
  5. H. & H. Supply Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Koehler v. Farmers Alliance Mutual InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. KirkseyNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Floyd v. WorobecNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. HansenNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Ketteler v. DanielNebraska Supreme Court · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API