Legal Opinion

Floyd v. Worobec

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1995No. S-93-960PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCaporale, J.

I. INTRODUCTION

In this negligence action arising out of the collision of two motor vehicles, the district court entered judgment pursuant to the verdict in favor of the defendant-appellee, Michael Worobec, against the plaintiff-appellant, Sharlene S. Floyd, thereby dismissing Floyd’s petition. Floyd appealed to the Nebraska Court of Appeals, asserting, in summary, that the district court erred in (1) not directing a verdict in her favor on the issue of liability and (2) excluding certain testimony from her treating chiropractor and consequently instructing improperly on the issue of damages.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Chlopek v. SchmallNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Brown v. Nebraska Public Power DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Wolf v. WaltNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  4. McDonald v. MillerNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Huntwork v. VossNebraska Supreme Court · 1995

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. NewmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Snyder Ex Rel. Snyder v. Contemporary Obstetrics & Gynecology, P.C.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  3. McIntosh Ex Rel. McIntosh v. Omaha Public SchoolsNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Dolberg v. PaltaniNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Westgate Recreation Ass'n v. Papio-Missouri River Natural Resources DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1996

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API