Legal Opinion

MacHolan v. Wynegar

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1994No. S-91-1155PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff appealed to the Nebraska Court of Appeals, which on July 23,1993, affirmed by memorandum opinion the judgment of the district court. Because the Court of Appeals Nebraska. The defendant admitted negligence, but denied that the plaintiff’s personal injuries were proximately caused by the accident. Following a jury trial, a verdict was returned in favor of the defendant.

The plaintiff appealed to the Nebraska Court of Appeals, which on July 23,1993, by affirmed memorandum opinion the judgment of the district court. Because the Court of Appeals did not review several trial exhibits…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Baker v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Kumar v. Douglas CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Petska v. Olson Gravel, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Greenberg Ex Rel. Greenberg v. Bishop Clarkson Memorial HospitalNebraska Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Beatty v. DavisNebraska Supreme Court · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. David v. DeLeonNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  2. McDonald v. MillerNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Hausman v. CowanNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Nickell v. RussellNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Scharmann v. Dayton Hudson Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API