Legal Opinion

United States v. One Red Lamborghini

United States Court of International Trade

Decided January 6, 1986No. Court 85-10-01393PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Opinion and Order

DiCARLO, Judge:

Plaintiff brings this in rem action under section 592(c)(5) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1592(c)(5) (1982), seeking forfeiture of two vehicles seized by the United States Customs Service (Customs) as improperly entered into the United States. Plaintiff sought a warrant for the arrest of the vehicles pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2461(b) (1982). 1 The Court did not sign the arrest warrant and requested, sua sponte, that plaintiff submit a memorandum setting forth the legal basis for its action. 2 The Court holds that section 592 does…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Park 'N Fly, Inc. v. Dollar Park & Fly, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Badaracco v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. United States v. Eight Thousand Eight Hundred & Fifty DollarsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Mills Music, Inc. v. SnyderSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. GordonUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
  2. United States v. Jac Natori Co.United States Court of International Trade · 1993
  3. United States v. Snuggles, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API