Legal Opinion

Universal Const. Co. v. City of Fort Lauderdale

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 30, 1953PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

68 So.2d 366 (1953)

UNIVERSAL CONST. CO.

v.

CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE.

Supreme Court of Florida. En Banc.

October 30, 1953.

Rehearing Denied December 11, 1953.

Earnest, Lewis, Smith & Jones and Paty, Downey & Paty, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

T.O. Berryhill, Carl A. Hiaasen and McCune, Hiaasen & Kelley, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

HOBSON, Justice.

Counsel for appellant earnestly insist in their petition for rehearing that in this lawsuit on the quantum meruit the cause of action is not the same as the cause of action in the equity suit wherein appellant in its counterclaim sought to set off…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gordon v. GordonSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
  2. Yates v. BallSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
  3. Hazen v. Cobb-Vaughan Motor Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1928
  4. Wallace v. LuxmooreSupreme Court of Florida · 1946
  5. Universal Const. Co. v. GoreSupreme Court of Florida · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. State v. McBrideSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
  2. Pérez v. BauzáSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1961
  3. Youngblood v. TaylorSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  4. Seaboard Coast LR Co. v. Industrial Contracting CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
  5. Tyson v. Viacom, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API