Legal Opinion

Adasa Inc. v. Avery Dennison Corporation

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided January 25, 2024No. 6:17-cv-01685Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE DIVISION ADASA INC., Case No. 6:17-cv-01685-MK Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER Re: SANCTIONS MANDATE v. AVERY DENNISON CORPORATION, Defendant. _________________________________________ KASUBHAI, United States Magistrate Judge: Before the Court is the Federal Circuit’s Mandate vacating and remanding the Court’s sanction of Defendant Avery Dennison for its discovery misconduct. Mandate ECF No. 457; see Adasa Inc. v. Avery Dennison Corp.,

55 F.4th 900, 917

(Fed. Cir. 2022), cert. denied,

143 S. Ct. 2561

(2023). Both parties consented to the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. R & R Sails, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  3. Julie Holmgren v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Julie Holmgren v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  4. Synqor, Inc. v. Artesyn Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
  5. Adasa Inc. v. Avery Dennison CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API