Legal Opinion

Williams v. Pressler

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 6, 1901PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error from the District Court of Noble County; before B. T. Hainer, Trial Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Burford, C. J. :

This was an action in forcible de-tainer, brought on appeal to the district court of Noble county. The property in controversy was a town lot in the city of Perry, the title of which was still in the United States, and for which both plaintiff and defendant were contestants before the interior department. The defendant, Williams, was in actual possession and the plaintiff, Press-ler, claimed that he was occupying as a tenant, and that the lease had been terminated by notice. The defendant denied the relation of landlord and tenant, and claimed possession…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Randolph v. LampkinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1890
  2. Knight v. FisherSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
  3. Henderson v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1854
  4. Richardson v. ColemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Lee v. CluteNevada Supreme Court · 1875

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Irvin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1980
  2. Cities Service Oil Co. v. KindtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  3. Barnhart v. International Harvester CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
  4. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company v. KilgoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  5. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API