Legal Opinion

Richardson v. Coleman

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 1892No. 15,222PublishedCited by 14 opinions

From the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtOlds, J.

This was an action by the appellant against theappellee for damages received by the appellant while working in the heading factory of the appellee, alleged to have resulted by the negligent use of a belt, and from weak and insecure fastenings with which the same was put together.

There was a trial by jury and the jury was instructed and retired to deliberate. Afterwards the court called the jury into court and gave them instruction numbered eight, in the giving of which it is contended by the appellant that the court erred.

The evidence is not in the record, but all of the instructions are in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Clem v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Eggleston v. WagnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Stevens v. Travelers Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Keesier v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  4. In re the Charges Against DarrowIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Emery v. Monongahela West Penn Public Service Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1932

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API