Legal Opinion
Crab Addison, Inc. v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 30, 2008No. B208142PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JACKSON, J.
INTRODUCTION
Petitioner Crab Addison, Inc. (CAI), 1 seeks a writ of mandate directing the trial court to vacate two orders granting discovery to real party in interest Roberto Martinez (Martinez). We deny the petition.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On September 7, 2007, Martinez filed his complaint as a class action, alleging causes of action for violation of the Labor Code, violation of Business and Professions Code section 17200 et seq. (“Unfair Competition Law”) and failure to provide mandated meal periods and rest breaks in violation of the Labor Code and orders of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hill v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Gentry v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- People ex rel. Lockyer v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- Pioneer Electronics (USA), Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Parris v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Williams v. Superior Court of L. A. Cnty.California Supreme Court · 2017
- Verdugo v. Alliantgroup, L.P.California Court of Appeal · 2015
- County of Los Angeles v. Los Angeles County Employee Relations CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- In re Insurance Installment Fee CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- In re Bank of America Wage & Hour Employment Practices LitigationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.