Meinken v. County of Nassau
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtL. Barron Hill, J.
This is a motion to strike an affirmative defense from the answer of the defendant town, on the ground that it is insufficient in law.
The action is one in equity to restrain a continuing trespass by the defendant, by reason of the discharge of surface waters *305on the land of the plaintiff and to recover $150,000 damages. No proof of claim was filed and the affirmative defense under attack pleads failure to comply with section 67 of the Town Law and section 50-e of the General Municipal Law as a defense to the claim for money damage.
The seeming inconsistency of the cases cited on both sides of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Thomann v. City of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Sammons v. . City of GloversvilleNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Foster v. WebsterNew York Supreme Court · 1943
3Cited by6 opinions
- Grant v. Town of KirklandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
- Malloy v. Town of NiskayunaNew York Supreme Court · 1970
- Bloss v. Village of CanastotaNew York Supreme Court · 1962
- Village of Victor v. AngeloNew York Supreme Court · 1958
- Grant v. Town of KirklandNew York Supreme Court · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.