Legal Opinion

Meinken v. County of Nassau

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1958PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtL. Barron Hill, J.

This is a motion to strike an affirmative defense from the answer of the defendant town, on the ground that it is insufficient in law.

The action is one in equity to restrain a continuing trespass by the defendant, by reason of the discharge of surface waters *305on the land of the plaintiff and to recover $150,000 damages. No proof of claim was filed and the affirmative defense under attack pleads failure to comply with section 67 of the Town Law and section 50-e of the General Municipal Law as a defense to the claim for money damage.

The seeming inconsistency of the cases cited on both sides of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thomann v. City of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Sammons v. . City of GloversvilleNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  3. Foster v. WebsterNew York Supreme Court · 1943

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Grant v. Town of KirklandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
  2. Malloy v. Town of NiskayunaNew York Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Bloss v. Village of CanastotaNew York Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Village of Victor v. AngeloNew York Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Grant v. Town of KirklandNew York Supreme Court · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API