Legal Opinion

District of Columbia v. Scott

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided July 1, 1954No. 12005PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

In this case the Municipal Court of Appeals reversed the conviction of appel-lee Scott, on the ground that he had been denied the effective assistance of counsel, and granted him a new trial. Scott v. District of Columbia, 1953, D.C.Mun. App., 99 A.2d 641.

Each case of this sort must be judged on its own merits. The decision here certainly should not be taken as a holding that a defendant can escape justice merely by hiring a lawyer who represents, in another case, a witness against that defendant. It means that under all the circumstances of this case there was a failure of representation…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Scott v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1953

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. United States v. Garland JeffersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
  2. Douglas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. United States v. Gregory HurtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
  4. Commonwealth v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  5. Allen v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API