Legal Opinion

Woodson v. Brown

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Decided November 7, 1995No. 94-852PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FARLEY, Judge:

This is an appeal from a May 11, 1994, decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA or Board) which found that the appellant had not submitted a well-grounded claim for service connection for a dental condition. This appeal is timely, and the Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 7252(a). For the reasons that follow, the Court will affirm the BVA decision.

I

The appellant served on active duty in the U.S. Army from February 1952 to February 1954. Record (R.) at 14. In December 1989, he filed an application with VA for medical benefits in order to have “nine teeth…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Murphy v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1990
  2. Grottveit v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1993
  3. Heuer v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1995
  4. King v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1993
  5. Parker v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. James Woodson, Claimant-Appellant v. Jesse Brown, Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  2. 11-22 176Board of Veterans' Appeals · 2018
  3. Bellezza v. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2002
  4. Bellezza v. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2002
  5. Daniel R. Gilbert v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API