Bellezza v. Principi
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
1ConcurrenceKramer, Chief Judge
I agree with the majority that a remand is required in this case because the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board or BVA) erred by limiting its review to whether a VA physician had determined under 38 C.F.R. § 17.121 (2001) that an emergency had ended. However, I disagree with the majority’s holding that the Board may review only whether the VA physician’s decision was based on sound medical judgment. For the reasons discussed below, I believe that § 17.121 is invalid to the extent that it is inconsistent with the statutory requirements of 38 U.S.C. §§ 5107(b) and 7104(a).
In its decision on…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gilbert v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1990
- Guerrieri v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1993
- Parker v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1994
- James Woodson, Claimant-Appellant v. Jesse Brown, Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Margaret E. White, Claimant-Appellant v. Anthony J. Principi, Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.