Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Bellezza v. Principi

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Decided June 4, 2002No. 99-1038Published

1ConcurrenceKramer, Chief Judge

I agree with the majority that a remand is required in this case because the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board or BVA) erred by limiting its review to whether a VA physician had determined under 38 C.F.R. § 17.121 (2001) that an emergency had ended. However, I disagree with the majority’s holding that the Board may review only whether the VA physician’s decision was based on sound medical judgment. For the reasons discussed below, I believe that § 17.121 is invalid to the extent that it is inconsistent with the statutory requirements of 38 U.S.C. §§ 5107(b) and 7104(a).

In its decision on…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1990
  2. Guerrieri v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1993
  3. Parker v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1994
  4. James Woodson, Claimant-Appellant v. Jesse Brown, Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  5. Margaret E. White, Claimant-Appellant v. Anthony J. Principi, Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API