Legal Opinion

Walter v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 17, 1968No. 151, September Term, 1967PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

Daniel Ambrose Walter and Jack Dempsey Maude, the appellants, were both convicted of grand larceny by the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County, Judge Ralph W. Powers presiding without a jury. Walter was given a three year sentence and Maude a four year sentence. They allege error in the trial court’s refusal to continue the case in order to obtain new counsel, in denying their rights to withdraw their waiver of a jury trial, and in the denial of their motions for a change of venue. In view of the contentions it will be unnecessary to give a statement of the facts.

On March 23, 1967 at the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Ungar v. SarafiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Henry v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Avery v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Chandler v. Warden FretagSupreme Court of the United States · 1954

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Sizemore v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  2. Mathias v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  3. Irvin v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State v. TemoneyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  5. Clark v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1969

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API