Legal Opinion
Charlotte Cross v. Walmart, Inc.
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided October 27, 2025No. 2:25-cv-01276Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 6 Charlotte Cross, Case No. 2:25-cv-01276-JAD-NJK 7 Plaintiff, Order 8 v. [Docket No. 17] 9 Walmart, Inc., 10 Defendant. 11 Pending before the Court is a stipulated protective order, outlining the parties’ agreement 12 as to the designation and treatment of information they deem to be confidential. Docket No. 17. 13 The Court ordered the parties to explain, by October 22, 2025, why judicial approval of their 14 agreement is necessary and warranted. Docket No. 18. The parties did not file a response. For 15 the reasons discussed below,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Debbie Foltz, Consumer Action United Policyholders Texas Watch, Intervenors, and Tierney Adamson Kevin Snead Daniel P. Johnson, Intervenors-Appellants. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, an Illinois Corporation California Institute of Medical Research & Technology, Inc., a Foreign Corporation Dba Comprehensive Medical Review Ralph Householder Steven Becker v. April Jean Ho Jim Mathis, Plaintiffs-Intervenors. Debbie Foltz, and Tierney Adamson Kevin Snead Daniel P. Johnson, Intervenors-Appellants v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, an Illinois Corporation, and California Institute of Medical Research & Technology, Inc., a Foreign Corporation Dba Comprehensive Medical Review Ralph Householder Steven Becker v. April Jean Ho Jim Mathis, Plaintiffs-Intervenors. Debbie Foltz, April J. Ho Jim Mathis Tierney Adamson Kevin Snead Daniel P. Johnson, Intervenors, and Consumer Action United Policy-Holders Texas Watch, Intervenors-Appellants v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, an Illinois Corporation, and Steven BeckerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Beckman Industries, Inc. Smithkline Beckman, and Stauffer Chemical Company, Intervenors-Appellees v. International Insurance Company, Beckman Industries, Inc. Smithkline Beckman, and Monsanto Company Reichhold Limited Fmc Corporation Bridgestone/firestone, Intervenors-Appellees v. International Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- In Re Roman Catholic Archbishop of Portland in Or.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. ButcherDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.