Legal Opinion

Fuhrmann v. Graves

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 29, 1922PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Clark, J.:

This is a proceeding instituted by the board of education of the city of Buffalo to compel defendant, who is commissioner of finance and accounts of the city, to countersign a warrant in favor of Ernest C. Hartwell, superintendent of schools, for $416.66, being one-half of his salary for July, 1922, on the basis of an annual salary of $10,000.

Early in the yeai 1922 the board of education of the city of Buffalo furnished defendant an estimate of the various amounts that would be required for salaries of the superintendent of schools, teachers and the supervising staff, and other…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Wells Newton Co. v. . CraigNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. Matter of Emerson v. . BuckNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  3. Fleischmann v. GravesNew York Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Reif v. SchwabAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  2. Securities and Exchange Commission v. City of Rochester, New YorkDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API