Legal Opinion

Panebianco v. City of Omaha

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1949No. 32617PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYeager, J.

This is a class action instituted by plaintiff in his own behalf and in behalf of all others in the city of Omaha, Nebraska, similarly situated, against the said city of Omaha, its mayor, its city councilmen, its chief of police, and its city clerk to have declared null and void and of no effect certain provisions of the city ordinances and for an injunction against the enforcement of the provisions in question.

To the petition which was filed by plaintiff the defendants filed a general demurrer. The demurrer was overruled. The defendants elected to stand on their demurrer whereupon default…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Miller v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Goldman v. CrowtherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
  3. Jardine v. City of PasadenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Marrs v. City of OxfordCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
  5. Central Nebraska Public Power & Irrigation District v. WalstonNebraska Supreme Court · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Buford v. DahlkeNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Noble v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Rhodes v. Star Herald Printing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1962
  4. MacH v. County of DouglasNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  5. MAY PLUMBING COMPANY v. ShaverNebraska Supreme Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API