Legal Opinion
Goldman v. Crowther
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided February 3, 1925PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtOffutt, J.
Daniel Goldman and his wife, as tenants by the entireties, own the property known, as 1513 Park Avenue in a part of Baltimore City which, under Ordinance Ho. 922 of the Mayor and City 'Council of Baltimore Oity, known as the ■“zoning 'ordinance,” is classified as a residence district. Tn May, 1923, Goldman undertook to use the basement of a'four story dwelling on that property for repairing, by hand and am ordinary sewing machine, for hire, used clothing for such patrons as had occasion to require his services. The business which he thu’s carried on required no alteration or repair of the…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Eubank v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Spann v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1921
- Mayor of Baltimore v. RadeckeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1878
- State ex rel. Carter v. HarperWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
- Hairston v. Danville & Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Department of Natural Resources v. Linchester Sand & Gravel Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Widgeon v. Eastern Shore Hospital CenterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Bourgeois v. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2014
- Mayor and Council of Rockville v. Rylyns Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.