Legal Opinion

Deane Buick Company v. Kendall

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 18, 1966No. 21853PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore

We refer to plaintiff in error, Deane Buick Company, as the employer; to Royal Indemnity Company as the insurance carrier; to the claimant Jane Kendall as the claimant; and to defendant in error The Industrial Commission of Colorado as the Commission. The claimant received an award under the Workmen’s Compensation Law for the death of her husband, which award was affirmed by the district court. The employer and the insurance carrier seek to reverse the award of the Commission by this writ of error.

William Kendall, husband of claimant, was a new car salesman for Deane Buick Company. Except for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mutual Life Insurance v. HillmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Commonwealth v. TrefethenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  3. Hunter v. State of New JerseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1878
  4. Alexander Film Company v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
  5. Lewis v. Lowe & Campbell Athletic Goods Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. MadsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  2. Berry's Coffee Shop, Inc. v. PalombaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
  3. Morrison v. BradleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API