Legal Opinion
Engerbretsen v. Engerbretsen
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided July 5, 1995No. C.A. No. 92C-07-093PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOLDSTEIN, Judge.
This is the Court’s decision on cross motions for summary judgment filed by Plaintiffs,. Arden B. Engergretsen, Eleanor En-gergretsen, and United Services Automobile Association (USAA), and Defendants, Arden A. Engergretsen, Deborah Engerbretsen and two minors, Andres L. Engergretsen and Arden A. Engerbretsen, Jr. For. the reasons set forth below, USAA’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
USAA filed this declaratory action in July 1992 to determine coverage under a homeowners insurance policy…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Merrill v. Crothall-American, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1992
- Burkhart v. DaviesSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991
- Hallowell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Delaware · 1982
- Fiduciary Trust Co. v. Fiduciary Trust Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1982
- Pamperin v. Milwaukee Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Nodak Mutual Insurance Co. v. Bahr-RennerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- Brown v. EverettSuperior Court of Delaware · 2019
- Hampton v. Titan Indemnity CompanySuperior Court of Delaware · 2017
- Jeffrey Lockhart v. Progressive Northern Insurance CompanyDelaware Court of Common Pleas · 2018
- Perry v. Hartford Underwriters Insurance Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 2015