Netograph Manufacturing Co. v. Scrugham
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the plaintiff, The Hetograph Manufacturing Company, from an order -of the Supreme Court, made at the Hew York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Hew York on the 19th day of April, 1909, granting the defendant’s motion to set aside the service of the summons and complaint herein.
1Opinion of the Court
Houghton, J.:
The defendant is a resident of the State of Ohio. He was indicted in the county of Hew York on a charge of conspiracy. In March, 1909, trial on said indictment was had and defendant voluntarily came from the State of Ohio to the county of Hew York for the purpose of defending himself thereon and appearing therein. The trial lasted several days and was concluded on March twenty-sixth, at about four o’clock f. m., upon the rendering of a verdict in defendant’s favor. After the conclusion of the trial there was not time that afternoon for the defendant to obtain a suitable train for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Adriance v. . LagraveNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Williams v. BaconNew York Supreme Court · 1834
- Slade v. JosephNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1874
- Browning v. AbramsNew York Supreme Court · 1876
- Lucas v. AlbeeCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.