Slade v. Joseph
New York Court of Common Pleas
Appeal in first five cases by defendant from order of special term denying motion to vacate order of arrest. Appeal in sixth case by plaintiffs from order of special term vacating order of arrest. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.
The defendant David Joseph applied to set •aside orders of arrest granted against him in these six actions under. § 179 of the Code, for fraud by false pretenses in contracting the debts in suit, claiming, first, that the charge of fraud was groundless, and, second, that he had been brought into this State from the State of Ohio where he resided, as a criminal charged with such fraud upon his creditors upon an extradition warrant, after indictment obtained at the instance of his creditors, and with the sole view of subjecting him to the service of orders of arrest in the civil actions…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. CornishSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1814
- Davis v. DuffieNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
- Depuy v. StrongNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
3Cited by9 opinions
- Netograph Manufacturing Co. v. . ScrughamNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Paul v. FargoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- Ryan v. EbeckeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Paul v. FargoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- Thermoid Co. v. FabelNew York Court of Appeals · 1958
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.