Morgan v. Halsey
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Case 107 — PETITION EQUITY APPEAL PROM LOUISVILLE LAW AND EQUITY COURT. 1. This court has jurisdiction notwithstanding the property or interest involved may be situated "without the State. (Mitchell v. Bunch, 2 Paige, 606; Hanley & King v. James et al, 7 Paige Chy., 213; Carroll v. Lee, 3 Gill & J., 404; Great Falls Mig.
Read the full summary
Case 107 — PETITION EQUITY APPEAL PROM LOUISVILLE LAW AND EQUITY COURT. 1. This court has jurisdiction notwithstanding the property or interest involved may be situated "without the State. (Mitchell v. Bunch, 2 Paige, 606; Hanley & King v. James et al, 7 Paige Chy., 213; Carroll v. Lee, 3 Gill & J., 404; Great Falls Mig. Co. v. Wooster, 23 N. H., 462> Massie v. Watts, 6 Cranch, 148; Watkins v. Hollinan, 16 Peters, 25 and 27; note to Penn v. Lord Baltimore, 3 Leading Cases in Equity, p. 783; Perry on Trusts, secs. 70 and 71; Mason v. Chambers, 4 J. J. Mar., 410 and 411; Newton v. Bronson, 13…
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE LEWIS
DELIVERED THE OPINION OF THE COURT.
March 4, 1887, Edmund T. Halsey, trustee under the will of Theodocia Strother, also executor, trustee and administrator under the will of Sally Williams Strother, Baroness of Fahnenberg, brought this action in Louisville Law and Equity Court, asking that court to construe the two wills, determining rights of all parties interested; to order settlements of his accounts, as such trustee, executor and administrator, and to immediately direct him whether he should make the contract for erection of a chapel at Spa, Kingdom of Belgium, that was provided…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Western Manufacturing Co. v. CottonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
- Marx v. RiceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
- St. Matthews Bank v. De CharetteCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
- California National Supply Co. (A Corporation) v. O'BrienCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921