St. Matthews Bank v. De Charette
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Stanley, Commissioner
Affirming.
The issues to be decided on this appeal are: (1) Whether a power of testamentary appointment is special or general: (2) if general, whether this court should, hold, as do the majority of courts, that the act of executing a general power ipso facto requires a court of equity to seize the property and subject it to the payment of. the debts of the donee if his estate is insufficient and. thereby deprive the appointee of his bounty.
The codicil of Mrs. Betty Me'riwether which forms the basis of this litigation is copied in full in De Charette…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- United States v. FieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- United States v. FieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Cutting v. . CuttingNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Prince De Bearn v. WinansCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1909
- Clapp v. IngrahamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Marx v. RiceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
- Decharette v. DecharetteCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
- De Charette v. De CharetteCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1936
- Howe v. Howe's Ex'xCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
- Fitschen v. United States Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1950
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.