Legal Opinion

Clark Schaeffer v. Gaar-Scott

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 5, 1914PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

Defendant in error brought this suit to. recover upon certain promissory notes executed by plaintiffs in error in part payment for a secondhand traction engine sold to them by defendant in error and for foreclosure of mortgage upon same. Defendants answered by a general denial, and specially pleaded a failure of consideration of the notes sued upon, in that the engine was sold under a guaranty that it would successfully pull four 12-inch gang plows in hog wallow land; that the engine was sold by and guaranty given by Paul W. Joplin, plaintiff’s agent in Houston; and that the same-wholly…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Torrey, Davidson & Grosscup v. Wm. Cameron & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Southern Pac. Co. v. C. H. Cox & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1911

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. J. I. Case Threshing Mach. Co. v. ManesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  2. Advance-Rumely Thresher Co. v. HigginsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  3. J. B. Colt Co. v. Knight & PerryTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  4. International Harvester Co. of America v. LeiferWyoming Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API