Legal Opinion
Claim of Bishop v. Comer & Pollock, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 2, 1937PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Hill, P. J., in which Heffernan, J., concurs; Bliss, J., concurs in the decision, with a separate opinion; McNamee, J., dissents, with an opinion in which Crapser, J., concurs.
Hill, P. J.
Appeal by the claimant from a decision denying an award for disablement on account of an occupational disease. He presented proof that his disease, pulmonary tuberculosis, was due to the nature of his employment as a counterman and clerk in a wholesale meat market. He worked in a normal temperature, but from ten to thirty times a day entered the cold storage room where the meat was kept. There is…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Matter of Connelly v. Hunt Furniture Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Matter of Lerner v. Rump Bros.New York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Claim of Jeffreyes v. Charles H. Sager Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
- Matter of Jeffreyes v. . Charles H. Sager CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Matter of O'Dell v. . Adirondack Electric Power CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Claim of Soukup v. Friedman Marble & Slate WorksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
- Claim of Roettinger v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
- Chausse v. LoweDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1938
- Claim of Roettinger v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962