Legal Opinion
Claim of Roettinger v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 26, 1962PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.
The employer and its carrier appeal from a decision and award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board for disability due to upper respiratory disease resulting from claimant’s exposure to cold in the course of his 15 years’ employment by appellant employer as a butcher.
*77Claimant testified that lie had no difficulty with his chest or with his breathing for many years after this employment commenced or until two or three years after he began to work some hours daily in the so-called icebox and that after the onset of his chest difficulties they gradually worsened over some years until he had an…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Matter of Goldberg v. 954 Marcy Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Claim of Detenbeck v. General Motors Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1956
- Matter of Harman v. Republic Aviation Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1948
- Claim of Bishop v. Comer & Pollock, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- Matter of Wolfe v. BrohmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Zoss v. United Building Centers, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1997