Legal Opinion
Sean Thomas Ryan v. Dee Anna Ryan
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided July 31, 2012No. 71S03-1111-DR-644PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SULLIVAN, Justice.
When Sean and Dee Anna Ryan divorced, they agreed to sell two properties they owned and divide the proceeds, subject to a proviso that neither party was required to accept a sale yielding net proceeds below specified mínimums. When the properties could not be sold at or above the specified mínimums, Dee Anna refused to waive the proviso. She was entitled by law to do so.
Background
When Sean Ryan filed for divorce on March 5, 2008, he and Dee Anna owned a residence in Granger, Indiana, and a lake house in Union, Michigan. Both properties had mortgages on them. The parties…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Whitaker v. BrunnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Stonger v. SorrellIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- Johnson v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
- Marriage of Myers v. MyersIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
- Dusenberry v. DusenberryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- AM General LLC v. James A. ArmourIndiana Supreme Court · 2015
- Terry and Laura Wagler, Larry and Jennifer Wagler, Norman Wagler, and Janet and Nathan Wagler v. West Boggs Sewer District Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- J.W. v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2019
- Barbara J. Pohl v. Michael G. PohlIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
- McVay v. Store House Co.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2017
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.