Legal Opinion

J.W. v. State of Indiana

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 2019No. Supreme Court Case 19S-JV-12PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Slaughter, Justice.

We held in Tumulty v. State , 666 N.E.2d 394 (Ind. 1996), that an adult criminal defendant cannot challenge the validity of his guilty plea on direct appeal. He must, instead, pursue post-conviction relief and raise in that proceeding any claims of error concerning his plea.

At issue here is whether to extend Tumulty to the juvenile-law counterpart to a criminal plea-namely, an agreed delinquency adjudication. We hold that juveniles cannot immediately challenge on direct appeal any errors concerning their agreed adjudication. But because juveniles are not eligible for…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Curtis A. Bethea v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Tumulty v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Raymundo v. Hammond Clinic Ass'nIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Georgos v. JacksonIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Jordan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of T.W. v. St. Vincent Hospital and Health Care Center, Inc. In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of A.M. v. Community Health Network, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Jamil Michael Pirant v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. B K v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2024
  4. J J v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2025
  5. M H v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2023

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API