Legal Opinion

In re Pettingill Enterprises, Inc.

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico

Decided February 6, 2013No. 11-12-10515 JAPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ROBERT H. JACOBVITZ, Bankruptcy Judge.

THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Motion to Allow Priority Administrative Expense filed by Bane Machinery, Inc. (“Bane Machinery”), by and through its attorney of record, Puccini Law, PA (Louis Puccini). See Docket No. 135 (the “Motion”). Debtor Pettingill Enterprises, Inc. (“PEI”) opposes the Motion. See Objection to Motion to Allow Bane Machinery Priority Administrative Expense, Docket No. 178; Supplemental Objection to Motion to Allow Bane Machinery Priority Administrative Expense, Docket No, 218 (together the “Objection”). The…

2Cases cited27 opinions

In Re Mammoth Mart, Inc., Debtor. Stanley Cramer v. Mammoth Mart, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
In Re Dant & Russell, Inc., Debtors. Burlington Northern Railroad Company, Creditor-Appellant v. Dant & Russell, Inc., Debtor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
In Re Jartran, Inc., Debtor. Fruehauf Corporation v. Jartran, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
Sharon Steel Corporation v. National Fuel Gas Distribution Corporation, Intervenor: James W. Toren, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
In Re Amarex, Inc., Debtor. Robert O. Isaac v. Temex Energy, Inc., Successor by Merger to Amarex, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

In Re: Avianca Holdings S.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 2023