Legal Opinion

Hale v. Sheehan

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1897No. 7360PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from the district court of Madison county. Tried below before Jackson, J.

1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.

The petition filed in the court below alleges, substantially, that plaintiff and defendant, during the summer and fall of 1889, were partners engaged in the buying and selling of horses, under the firm name of Hale & Sheehan, plaintiff furnishing the capital for the enterprise and the defendant his services and skill, the profits and losses to be shared equally; that on the 15th day of *185October there were sixty-one head of horses and sixteen sucking colts belonging to the firm on the ranch of the defendant, in Fremont county, Wyoming, and on said date the partnership was dissolved and a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Woodard v. BairdNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Andres v. KridlerNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Walter Bros. v. Reed & GerardNebraska Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Gallagher v. M. E. Smith & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  5. School District No. 8 v. EstesNebraska Supreme Court · 1882

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Canfield Lumber Co. v. Kint Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  2. Wood, Curtis & Co. v. SeurichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
  3. Bodtke v. BrattenNebraska Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Fred Gorder & Son v. PankoninNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Muller v. PrattNebraska Supreme Court · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API