Legal Opinion

In Re the Necessity for the Hospitalization of Stephen O.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 2013No. 6857 S-13764PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STOWERS, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Parents of a man who were concerned that he had suffered a possible psychotic break reported his behavior to a mental health clinician in Haines. The clinician obtained an ex parte order to take the man into custody and transport him to the hospital in Juneau for examination and treatment. Haines police took him into custody, but due to bad weather he remained in the Haines jail for six days before he was transported to Juneau for evaluation. After a contested hearing, the superior court found by clear and convincing evidence that the man was gravely…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. O'Connor v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Humphrey v. CadySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  5. In Re the Detention of LaBelleWashington Supreme Court · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In Re Hospitalization of Naomi B.Alaska Supreme Court · 2019
  2. In Re the Necessity for the Hospitalization of Mark V.Alaska Supreme Court · 2016
  3. In Re Hospitalization of Connor J.Alaska Supreme Court · 2019
  4. In the Matter of the Necessity for the Hospitalization of Luciano G.Alaska Supreme Court · 2019
  5. In the Matter of the Necessity for the Hospitalization of Rabi R.Alaska Supreme Court · 2020

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API