Roseburg Forest Products v. Lund
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.
Employer seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board that concluded, in part, that employer had previously accepted claimant’s shoulder condition as a combined condition. Employer makes three assignments of error: first, that the board erred in holding that employer accepted a combined condition; second, that the board’s conclusion that employer accepted a combined condition is not supported by substantial evidence; and third, that the board’s conclusion that employer accepted a combined condition is dicta. We affirm.
We state the facts, which are not in dispute, as the board…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Brumnett v. Psychiatric Security Review BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Columbia Forest Products v. WoolnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
3Cited by1 opinion
- Griffin v. Dish Network Servs. (In re Comp. of Griffin)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019