Legal Opinion

IN RE ENOVIX CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION

District Court, N.D. California

Decided July 23, 2024No. 3:23-cv-00071Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MAURICE L. TWITCHELL, et al., Case No. 23-cv-00071-SI 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 9 v. DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS SAC 10 ENOVIX CORPORATION, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 105 11 Defendants. 12 13 Now before the Court is defendants’ motion to dismiss the Second Amended Class Action 14 Complaint. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court found this matter appropriate for 15 resolution without oral argument and vacated the hearing set for July 19, 2024. For the reasons set 16 forth below, the Court GRANTS…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  3. Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Lee v. City Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API