Legal Opinion
In re M.A.R.
New York City Family Court
Decided March 15, 2007PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
*785OPINION OF THE COURT
Richard S. Lawrence, J.
Respondent moves this court for a Mapp hearing (Mapp v Ohio, 367 US 643 [1961]) to determine whether there was probable cause to conduct a search of the respondent; and the remedy sought is suppression of the physical evidence obtained. Respondent submits, in support, her attorney’s affirmation which alleges that the basis for this motion is set forth in Criminal Procedure Law § 710.20.
The search at issue is one which occurred at the respondent’s school, and which was conducted by school personnel, upon respondent’s purse and book bag, which resulted…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- People v. HuntleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
- People v. MendozaNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- People v. Ramirez-PortorealNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Matter of M.A.R.New York Family Court, Nassau County · 2007