Legal Opinion

Hammes Co. Healthcare, LLC v. Tri-City Healthcare District

District Court, S.D. California

Decided July 11, 2011No. 3:09-cr-02324PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER: (1) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; (2) DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ EX PARTE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF

(ECF Nos. 38 77)

JANIS L. SAMMARTINO, District Judge.

Presently before the Court is Defendants Tri-City Healthcare District, Larry Anderson, and Pamela Smith’s motion for partial summary judgment. (ECF No. 38.) Also before the Court are numerous responsive pleadings. 1 , 2 (ECF Nos. 50-53, 74-75.) Having considered the parties’ arguments and the law, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Defendants’ motion.

BACKGROUND

This…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Freeman v. ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cynthia Covington v. PHH Mortgage Corporation; Aryming Asset Management, LLC; Madison Management Services, LLC; Veripro Solutions, Inc.; Nationstar Mortgage, LLC; ARY LS 4 LLC; and Does 1-50District Court, E.D. California · 2025
  2. Fischer v. Kelly Services Global, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API