Hammes Co. Healthcare, LLC v. Tri-City Healthcare District
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER: (1) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; (2) DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ EX PARTE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF
(ECF Nos. 38 77)
JANIS L. SAMMARTINO, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is Defendants Tri-City Healthcare District, Larry Anderson, and Pamela Smith’s motion for partial summary judgment. (ECF No. 38.) Also before the Court are numerous responsive pleadings. 1 , 2 (ECF Nos. 50-53, 74-75.) Having considered the parties’ arguments and the law, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Defendants’ motion.
BACKGROUND
This…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
- Freeman v. ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cynthia Covington v. PHH Mortgage Corporation; Aryming Asset Management, LLC; Madison Management Services, LLC; Veripro Solutions, Inc.; Nationstar Mortgage, LLC; ARY LS 4 LLC; and Does 1-50District Court, E.D. California · 2025
- Fischer v. Kelly Services Global, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2023