Legal Opinion

Beck v. Beck

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 29, 1972No. 7222DC22PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRAHAM, Judge.

Defendant contends that in order to be entitled to a divorce a plaintiff must show that a marital separation for the statutory period was by mutual agreement or under a decree of court. This was true prior to 1937. In that year the divorce statute was amended so as to remove this requirement. Byers v. Byers, 222 N.C. 298, 22 S.E. 2d 902. During the past 35 years a husband and wife have been deemed to live separate and apart within the meaning of the divorce statute when: (1) they live separate and apart physically for an uninterrupted period of time at least as long as the time…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Byers v. . ByersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  2. Richardson v. RichardsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. Mallard v. MallardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hooker v. HookerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1975
  2. Swygert v. SwygertCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Earles v. EarlesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API