Densler v. Metropolitan Edison Co.

Opinion by

Hoffman, J.,

Appellant contends that the lower court erred in excluding certain evidence which he offered concerning the appellee’s alleged negligence, and in subsequently granting appellee’s motion' for a compulsory nonsuit.

In July, 1968, the appellant, Harry Densler, was employed as a technician for Clear-Pic Cablevision Co., a division of National Trans-Video, Inc., a cable television company. Clear-Pic, by virtue of a licensing agreement, was permitted to attach its cable to poles owned and operated by the appellee, Metropolitan Edison Co., (“Met Ed”) an electric power company.…