Legal Opinion
Sauk County v. Gumz
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided July 24, 2003No. 02-0204PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VERGERONT, PJ.
¶ 1. This action was brought by Sauk County to enjoin an event known as "Weed-stock 2000" from taking place because no license had been obtained under the County's open-air assembly ordinance. Ben Masel, the organizer of the event, appeals the circuit court's decision and order declaring that the ordinance is constitutional, enjoining him 1 from holding Weedstock in Sauk County without compliance with the ordinance, and dismissing his counterclaims against the County. Masel contends the ordi nance: (1) violates the First Amendment because it is an impermissible prior restraint…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- R. A. v. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Foremost Farms USA Cooperative v. Performance Process, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2006
- State v. DeAnthony K. MuldrowWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
- Sullivan v. City of AugustaDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2005
- United Youth Careers, Inc. v. CITY OF AMES, IADistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2006
- State v. CruteCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.